<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/49a29f5d-2d07-11ec-8cc5-fd8f246d4839?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/49a29f5d-2d07-11ec-8cc5-fd8f246d4839</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-21T06:05:53</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-21T06:05:53</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Lacey Hunt on why we&#x27;re not going to stagflate, but continue &#x22;Turning Japanese&#x22;</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/49a29f5d-2d07-11ec-8cc5-fd8f246d4839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
The U.S. economy has clearly experienced
an unprecedented set of supply side disruptions,
which serve to shift the upward sloping aggregate
supply curve inward. In a graph, with aggregate
prices on the vertical axis and real GDP on the
horizontal axis, this causes the aggregate supply
and demand curves to intersect at a higher
price level and lower level of real GDP. This
drop in real GDP, often referred to as a supply
side recession, increases what is known as the
deflationary gap, which means that the level of
real GDP falls further from the level of potential
GDP. This deflationary gap in turn leads to
demand destruction setting in motion a process
that will eventually reverse the rise in inflation.
In the 1970s, the economy was beset by a string
of such supply curve shifts primarily because of
falling oil production. Then the inflation rate did
not fall but continued to march higher. However,
before Paul Volcker was made Fed chair late
in the decade, the Fed actions allowed money
supply to accelerate steadily. During the 1970s,
unlike currently, the velocity of money was stable
(although not constant). As a result, the aggregate
demand curve (C + I + G +X = M x V) also shifted
steadily outward. This allowed the inflation from
the supply side disruptions to become entrenched.
Currently, however, the decline in money growth
and velocity indicate that the inflation induced
supply side shocks will eventually be reversed.
In this environment, Treasury bond yields could
temporarily be pushed higher in response to
inflation. These sporadic moves will not be
maintained. The trend in longer yields remains
downward.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/49a29f5d-2d07-11ec-8cc5-fd8f246d4839</guid>
<pubDate>2021-10-14T15:56:26</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/49a29f5d-2d07-11ec-8cc5-fd8f246d4839" type="text/html" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
