<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/845f8b5e-13f4-11ec-bdd7-e9ecde4cdd50?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/845f8b5e-13f4-11ec-bdd7-e9ecde4cdd50</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-16T14:14:44</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-16T14:14:44</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>A possible future for cryptocurrency</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/845f8b5e-13f4-11ec-bdd7-e9ecde4cdd50</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://zerocash-project.org/how_zerocash_works.html">Zerocoin</a> is the best hope I've seen so far for getting true anonymity in a bitcoin-like digital cash.
It accomplishes this with <a href="http://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf">Zero Knowledge Proofs</a>.
</p><p>
Zero Knowledge Proofs for the Layman is <a href="http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~mkowalcz/628.pdf">here</a>.
</p><p>
Regrettably, it appears development on this project has more-or-less stalled.
<a href="http://shadow.cash">ShadowCoin</a> claims to have cribbed a bit of the work, but I see no evidence of it being used to obscure transaction amounts, etc.
</p><p>
Zerocoin has one weakness, though.  The issuer must be trusted.
This works out if you are the one creating your private coins from previously public ones;
however that is probably enough to get you put on the 'naughty list' in certain regulatory climes.
</p><p>
That said, I believe a <a href="http://crypto.stanford.edu/craig/craig-thesis.pdf">Homomorphic Encryption Scheme</a> could be used to overcome this difficulty.
This sort of scheme allows for modifications to some block of ciphertext (say, a blockchain?) without actually having to know the contents.
As such, you could have a blockchain that is fully obscured to it's users.
</p><p>
The only weakness there would be the original setup of the blockchain itself.
This could be overcome by witnessed/notarized creation of the private key, and it's subsequent destruction (as it would not be needed to read/write new transactions).
</p><p>
Effectively the blockchain becomes a large binary blob that is written to via a homomorphic encryption scheme, and that can only be read by inference through a zero-knowledge proof scheme.
And then only enough to know the amount of coins in your account has changed (did I come out from the $50 or $100 branch, as in the Ali-Baba example).
</p><p>
So the mathematics are finally ready to be put together to create Eris' golden apple.
I pray somebody gets the time to put it together soon.
</p>
]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/845f8b5e-13f4-11ec-bdd7-e9ecde4cdd50</guid>
<pubDate>2015-08-08T18:19:05</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/845f8b5e-13f4-11ec-bdd7-e9ecde4cdd50" type="text/html" />
</item>
<item>
<title>A possible future for cryptocurrency</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1439057945</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://zerocash-project.org/how_zerocash_works.html">Zerocoin</a> is the best hope I've seen so far for getting true anonymity in a bitcoin-like digital cash.
It accomplishes this with <a href="http://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf">Zero Knowledge Proofs</a>.
</p><p>
Zero Knowledge Proofs for the Layman is <a href="http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~mkowalcz/628.pdf">here</a>.
</p><p>
Regrettably, it appears development on this project has more-or-less stalled.
<a href="http://shadow.cash">ShadowCoin</a> claims to have cribbed a bit of the work, but I see no evidence of it being used to obscure transaction amounts, etc.
</p><p>
Zerocoin has one weakness, though.  The issuer must be trusted.
This works out if you are the one creating your private coins from previously public ones;
however that is probably enough to get you put on the 'naughty list' in certain regulatory climes.
</p><p>
That said, I believe a <a href="http://crypto.stanford.edu/craig/craig-thesis.pdf">Homomorphic Encryption Scheme</a> could be used to overcome this difficulty.
This sort of scheme allows for modifications to some block of ciphertext (say, a blockchain?) without actually having to know the contents.
As such, you could have a blockchain that is fully obscured to it's users.
</p><p>
The only weakness there would be the original setup of the blockchain itself.
This could be overcome by witnessed/notarized creation of the private key, and it's subsequent destruction (as it would not be needed to read/write new transactions).
</p><p>
Effectively the blockchain becomes a large binary blob that is written to via a homomorphic encryption scheme, and that can only be read by inference through a zero-knowledge proof scheme.
And then only enough to know the amount of coins in your account has changed (did I come out from the $50 or $100 branch, as in the Ali-Baba example).
</p><p>
So the mathematics are finally ready to be put together to create Eris' golden apple.
I pray somebody gets the time to put it together soon.
</p>
]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1439057945</guid>
<pubDate>2015-08-08T18:19:05</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1439057945" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
